TreeSize is still a perfectly good utility for locating trouble spots and data that can potentially be moved to other drives or deleted. That said, however, the data it is missing is likely data you would not want to or be able to delete anyways. That's not to say TreeSize is no good I just wouldn't trust it to report all the data on the drive. TreeSize is missing about 30-40GB of data. Enter the size you want to shrink or expand the partition and press enter: youre done Clean up your partition before you clean it. After right-clicking on the partition you want to manage, choose between: Extend volume. Click on Storage, then on Disk Management. Explorer (both reported and tallied free space), chkdsk, TuneUp DSE, and df all reported consistent results. Right-click on My Computer and click on Manage. So slight mismatches can be considered "close enough", but 35GB is not a slight mismatch.Īs you can see, TreeSize is the odd one out. Some discrepancies can be expected above due to the various techniques used to tally space, the list of files included, and especially hard drive activity that happened while I was performing the above (temporary file activity, search indexing, browser caching, etc.). TuneUp Disk Space Explorer reports 252,794.88 MB (excludes system and hidden files, very close to Explorer).TreeSize Professional shows the size, allocated and wasted space, 3D charts, last access. chkdsk's total (259,641.4 MB) roughly matches Explorer's total (259,068.5 MB), TreeSize is the odd man out. TreeSize Professional - Powerful and flexible hard disk space manager.chkdsk reports 64.0 MB used by the NTFS log See the size of all folders including their subfolders and break it down to the file level Visually track down disk usage in the pie or bar chart Tree maps.chkdsk reports 1055.66 MB used by the system (e.g.chkdsk reports 354.8 MB used for indexes (TreeSize will not show this).chkdsk reports 258,166.9 MB used for files.Explorer (select all files => properties) reports 254,749.0 MB used (does actual calculation, leaves out hidden files, still shows ~35GB more than TreeSize).Explorer (drive properties) reports 259,068.5 MB used (reports cached free space value, shows ~40GB more than TreeSize).TreeSize reports 219,231.0 MB allocated (1GB wasted) TreeSize Professional shows you the size, allocated and wasted disk space number of files, 3D charts, the last access date, the file owner and permissions.On my system (1TB drive with 4K clusters): ![]() There is a good general article about free space discrepancies in NTFS, although that primarily refers to discrepancies in what Explorer reports, and does not cover the difference between Explorer and TreeSize. "allocated", by the way, but this would not explain your difference (nor would other answers here regarding difference in allocated space) as TreeSize reports the allocated space (meaning that TreeSize would show a higher total than the sum of the file sizes, which is what you want). You can hold the mouse over "C:\" in TreeSize, and you will see a field for "size" vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |